Aerator Pumps & Electric Valves Controlled Test

[h20king 794]

I used the jabsco reversible pumps but I did a quick search on e bay and seller boatersworldonline had the Johnson's for $177 prices are starting to go up as the season gets closer

[Live Laugh & Surf 0]

I used the jabsco reversible pumps but I did a quick search on e bay and seller boatersworldonline had the Johnson's for $177 prices are starting to go up as the season gets closer

 

 

Excellent, thanks.

[islander033 2]

...as the season gets closer

Don't forget to install your 'T' handle before you hit the water again.

[Oldwakedude 0]

Just a comment on something I noted this weekend out on the boat. Mine is a 2008 Enzo 230 (I think early 2008 as it has some 2007 model items). I checked out the jabsco pumps as it was mentioned that the factory installed water puppy instead of Ballast puppy. Well indeed the pumps in my boat were labeled "Water Puppy", BUT, the model number is 18220-2123 (I have video if you doubt me), which is a Ballast Puppy number, although I must admit, sometimes seems that it pumps like a water puppy, definitely going to remove the springs from the jar valves. Excellent thread!

[Live Laugh & Surf 0]

I used the jabsco reversible pumps but I did a quick search on e bay and seller boatersworldonline had the Johnson's for $177 prices are starting to go up as the season gets closer

 

 

Just a heads-up for others who may be looking for the Johnson pumps. The Johnson pump listed on boatersworldonline for $177 is the Johnson Heavy Duty Impeller Pump Model F3B-19 12V Bronz model F3B-19 (3/8" NPT) and it is not rated at 13.7 GPM.

 

The Johnson pump to look for is the Johnson Ultra Ballast Pump model JS 10-24690-03 (1/2" NPT) or sometimes shown as model 102469003. This is the pump that is rated at 13.7 GPM.

 

I almost pulled the trigger on the wrong pump.

[h20king 794]

sorry bro when i said I did a quick search I meant a quick search.so did you find your pumps??? if so how much???that's the main reason I went with jabsco parts and pumps are more readily available

[Bigcatpt 408]

sorry bro when i said I did a quick search I meant a quick search.so did you find your pumps??? if so how much???that's the main reason I went with jabsco parts and pumps are more readily available

 

 

I got mine from Bobby at maxwake.com and they were $200 each and they are the one's rated at 13.7 GPM... Bobby knows a lot about ballast systems and his customer service is awesome!!

[duffymahoney 10]

Bobby is where I get all my sacs. He is a great guy and really knows his stuff. He can also make custom ballast wiring harnesses.

[volzalum 280]

Another forum has a group discount on the Jabsco Ballast Puppies:

 

$160 w/o switch

$170 w switch

 

PM me if you want the details.

 

-Dax

[volzalum 280]

On a WW thread, several swear by the Irritrol 700 valves versus the orbit valves. Supposedly flow a greater volume of water.

[Live Laugh & Surf 0]

On a WW thread, several swear by the Irritrol 700 valves versus the orbit valves. Supposedly flow a greater volume of water.

 

The Irritol 700 valve looks promissing. I will try and find one locally and test it once my new Johnson pumps arrive from Bobby at Max Wake. Here's a link to a spec sheet. Check out the second page where they show the difference in their design to that of other sprinkler valves: http://www.irritrol.com/pdf/sellsheet_700.pdf

 

Thanks for sharing Volzalum I'll get back with the results of the test soon.

 

Cheers

[Bigcatpt 408]

I can't wait to see how the johnson pumps perform. Make sure and test them for max volume without any valves to get a baseline. Glad Bobby was able to take care of you.

[Live Laugh & Surf 0]

Howdy Folks,

 

Today I completed the backyard test of the Johnson Ultra Ballast pump and the 1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve with and without the internal spring installed. I have incorporated the results of these tests into the previous posted test data.

 

To conduct these tests I utilized the following:

- Swimming pool (unrestricted water source)

- 12 vdc Lawn & Garden Battery with 160 cold cranking amps from Pep Boys

- Jabsco Ballast Puppy Advertised @ 11 GPM or 660 GPH

- Johnson Ultra Ballast Pump Advertised @ 13.7 GPM or 822 GPH

- Mayfair 1000 aerator pump Advertised @ 16.66 GPM or 1000 GPH

- Tsunami 1200 aerator pump Advertised @ 20 GPM or 1200 GPH

- 1” Orbit Jar Top Valve with the internal spring installed

- 1” Orbit Jar Top Valve without the internal spring installed

- 1” brass 12 vdc valve

- 1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve with the internal spring installed

- 1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve without the internal spring installed

- 1.25” OD x 1” ID vinyl hose (no kinks)

- 3 orange Home Depot 5-gallon buckets measured at 1-gallon increments

- Stop watch set to countdown 1 minute with alarm

 

Each setup was tested three separate times to validate the accuracy of the test and the test was not begun until a maximum stream of water had commenced. The “Unrestricted Test” was measured with a 3’ section of 1.25” OD x 1” ID vinyl hose from the pool to the pump and a 3’ section of 1.25” OD x 1” ID vinyl hose from the pump to the 5 gallon bucket without a valve attached. Each of the pumps and valves were new out of the box.

 

Here are the results for the Jabsco Ballast Puppy pump:

Advertised @ 11 GPM or 660 GPH

Unrestricted Test: 11.5 GPM or 690 GPH

1” Orbit Jar Top Valve with internal spring: 8.0 GPM or 480 GPH

1” Orbit Jar Top Valve without internal spring: 9.5 GPM or 570 GPH

1” brass 12 vdc valve: 10.0 GPM or 600 GPH

1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve with the internal spring installed: 9.0 GPM or 540 GPH

1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve without the internal spring installed: 9.5 GPM or 570 GPH

 

Here are the results for the Johnson Ultra Ballast pump:

Advertised @ 13.7 GPM or 822 GPH

Unrestricted Test: 13.5 GPM or 810 GPH

1” Orbit Jar Top Valve with internal spring: 9.5 GPM or 570 GPH

1” Orbit Jar Top Valve without internal spring: 12.25 GPM or 735 GPH

1” brass 12 vdc valve: 12.5 GPM or 750 GPH

1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve with the internal spring installed: 12.25 GPM or 735 GPH

1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve without the internal spring installed: 12.5 GPM or 750 GPH

 

 

 

 

Here are the results for the Mayfair 1000 aerator pump:

Advertised @ 16.66 GPM or 1000 GPH

Unrestricted Test: 10 GPM or 600 GPH

1” Orbit Jar Top Valve with internal spring: 3 GPM or 180 GPH

1” Orbit Jar Top Valve without internal spring: 6.5 GPM or 390 GPH

¾” brass 12 vdc valve: 6.5 GPM or 390 GPH

1” brass 12 vdc valve: 7.5 GPM or 450 GPH

1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve with the internal spring installed: 5.75 GPM or 345 GPH

1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve without the internal spring installed: 7.75 GPM or 465 GPH

 

Here are results for the Tsunami 1200 aerator pump:

Advertised @ 20.0 GPM or 1200 GPH

Unrestricted Test: 13 GPM or 780 GPH

1” Orbit Jar Top Valve with internal spring: 3 GPM or 180 GP

1” Orbit Jar Top Valve without internal spring: 6.5 GPM or 390 GPH

¾” brass 12 vdc valve: 6.5 GPM or 390 GPH

1” brass 12 vdc valve: 7.5 GPM or 450 GPH

1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve with the internal spring installed: 6.25 GPM or 375 GPH

1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve without the internal spring installed: 9.5 GPM or 570 GPH

 

The height of the 5-gallon bucket utilized was 14.5 inches, but I held the hose slightly above the bucket at approximately 18 inches. Why is this important? For those not familiar with aerator type pumps; aerator type pumps such as the Tsunami 1200 and the Mayfair 1000 move high volumes of water, but at a very low pressure. A pump’s max flow is rated at what is referred to as “Open Flow” or inlet-to-outlet, nothing attached. Anytime an aerator pump has to push water upward there is going to be a significant drop in max flow rate as can be seen with the Tsunami pump which had a tested flow rate of 13 GPM or 780 GPH at 18 inches vertical. Here is a link to the Rule 1100 aerator pump which advertises a flow rate of 18.33 GPM or 1100 GPH, but according to the chart at 3.35’ it flows 13.17 GPM or 790 GPH (a significant drop) http://www.rule-industries.com/files/itemdoc134791.pdf

 

My first concern with removing the internal spring from the 1” Orbit Jar Top Valve and the 1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve was that with no power applied to the valve (valve closed) that there may be a possibility of the inlet pressure unseating the diaphragm and allowing water to pass through the valve. The 1” Orbit Jar Top Valve without the internal spring installed remained closed and no water passed through, but the 1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve without the internal spring installed initially allowed water to pass through for about 3 seconds and then reseated itself and no additional water passed through. For those wondering, the Jabsco Ballast Puppy pump came with the green colored impeller installed and the battery was recharged between test sets.

 

As can be seen from the test data, removing the internal spring from the 1” Orbit Jar Top Valve and the 1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve had a significant affect on water flow (way to go CenturionSkier!). It also appears from the test that when utilizing either of these two aerator pumps that the diaphragm type valves will have a significant impact on max flow rate. Incorporating a valve also had an impact on the max flow rate of the impeller pumps, but to a lesser degree due to the increased pressure of the impeller type pumps.

 

As Bigshow pointed out, we can probably expect to get a slight increase in output from these pumps if they are being feed 14 vdc from the boats electrical system.

 

So after reviewing the results of these tests here is my plan. I’m planning a five sac system; (2) Enzo Sacs (~1450#), (2) bow sacs (~ 400# each) and a factory center mid-ship tank (~ 250#). I still want my ballast system to be push-button automatic so I plan to utilize seven 1” Orbit Jar Top Valve without the internal spring installed and feed each Enzo sac with two of these valves, thus taking advantage of both Johnson pumps at once. All plumbing will be 1” ID . Although the Johnson pump pushing through the 1” Orbit Jar Top Valve without internal spring installed tested at 12.25 GPM or 735 GPH, I expect to loose some flow due to the manifold system and bends in the plumbing. But I should easily meet my goal of filling an Enzo sac in less than 10 minutes with this setup.

 

I prefer the 1” Orbit Jar Top Valve without the internal spring over the 1” brass 12 vdc valve or the 1” Irritrol 700 Series Valve due to the availability of replacement parts (Home Depot is just around the corner).

 

In my research I came across an interesting table for max flow rates of Flexible PVC. Here is the link: http://flexpvc.com/WaterFlowBasedOnPipeSize.shtml I have seen where some have touted a 1” hose with a max flow rate of 60 GPM, according to the chart this is possible but the flow rate is at 18 fps (a high pressure not likely to be seen by these type pumps). Referring to the chart we are more likely to expect a max flow rate around 37 GPM (12 fps) based on the pressure of our pumps.

 

Many thanks to the great folks at Texas Sport Boats. Without their help in lending a Jabsco Ballast Puppy we would have a very limited test data set. It’s awesome to have such great dealer support. This completes my tests-I’m officially out of the testing business. Hopefully this data will clear up some misconceptions and help others with their ballast build.

 

I am not very familiar with this site, but if stickies are allowed maybe the administrator will post this one as a sticky as I have not seen any similar test data available on the net and having a sticky beats an extensive search.

 

Best of luck in your ballast build,

 

 

Cheers

Aerator_Pumps_and_Electric_Valves_Test_Final.doc

[Bigcatpt 408]

Amazing work!!!!!

 

This should clear up some of the misconceptions about various ballast system designs! Very nice work!!!

[smitty1258 0]

wheres the cliff notes?

 

Edited March 22, 2010 by smitty1258

[Oldwakedude 0]

wheres the cliff notes?

 

 

Heck with the cliff notes, that's too much work, I want the Video .

 

Hey Dan, do you work for EM URC? Anyways, excellent post, stick around.

 

If you are in North Houston and want to do some surfing PM me.

Edited March 23, 2010 by Oldwakedude

[Live Laugh & Surf 0]

Howdy,

 

After completing the test of pumps and valves combinations, I began assembling a list of parts needed to build my ballast system. If you recall my plan is to utilize two Johnson pumps feeding into the factory 1” manifold incorporating (7) 1” Orbit vales less the internal spring. If you are not familiar with the factory setup, everything after the 1” Orbit valves come stock at ¾”. This got me to wondering if the ¾” hose and fittings after the Orbit valve would impact max flow rate to the sacs/tank.

 

So I picked up Fly High’s 1” W743 & W746 fittings and Fly High’s ¾” W736 & W742 fittings. I first attached Fly High’s 1” W743 & W746 fittings to the 1” ID hose configuration and the results were exactly the same as the previous test of the 1” Orbit Jar Top Valve without internal spring: 12.25 GPM or 735 GPH (no surprise here, really just a validation test). I then attached the ¾” ID hose from the 1” Orbit valves to Fly High’s ¾” W736 & W742 fittings to see if there was any loss in max flow rate. The rate of flow was reduced by only 0.25 GPM (12 GPM or 720 GPH total flow).

 

After much thought and time spent shopping for parts I have decided to immolate the factory plumbing and go with ¾” everything after the 1” Orbit vales. If one considers that an Enzo sac is approximately 180 gallons and if fed by two Johnson pumps at either 25 GPM total (1” ID hose & Fly High’s 1” W743 & W746 fittings) or 24 GPM total (3/4” ID hose & Fly High’s ¾” W736 & W742 fittings), the difference in time is minuscule (a mere18 seconds; 7.2 minutes vs 7.5 minutes). I then considered the cost factor and it quickly became a difference I can live with.

 

Sorry folks, I have no plans to re-test each of the previous test configurations, but I believe we could probably assume the results would be very similar; a 0.25 GPM reduction in max flow rate. Another piece of my puzzle revealed.

 

Happy Surfing,

 

Dan

[Bigcatpt 408]

Another fine piece of work!!!